now reading: The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey

I mentioned yesterday that I’m sort of in despair over the crappy level of science fiction writing (these days? always? unclear.)

I’m reading non-fiction to keep my brain busy, and I started this two days ago:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1137281650

Modern states commonly deploy coercion in a wide array of circumstances in which the resort to force would clearly be wrong for any private agent. What entitles the state to behave in this manner? And why should citizens obey its commands? This book examines theories of political authority, from the social contract theory, to theories of democratic authorization, to fairness- and consequence-based theories. Ultimately, no theory of authority succeeds, and thus no government has the kind of authority often ascribed to governments.

The author goes on to discuss how voluntary and competitive institutions could provide the central goods for the sake of which the state is often deemed necessary, including law, protection from private criminals, and national security. An orderly and livable society thus does not require acquiescence in the illusion of political authority.

So far it’s excellent. Dense, dense, dense, but excellent. The utterly destructive take-down of Rawls and his “veil of ignorance” argument is brutal and wonderful.

This is the book I would love to have written about my lack of comprehension of the assertion “you have to do what the government says…because it’s the government”.

…if only I had a PhD, ten years, and another dozen IQ points.

If you’re the kind of person who finds tightly argued philosophy interesting, Joe Bob says “pick it up”. $35 isn’t cheap, but it’s a vital, foundational book for an analytically-minded voluntaryist

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *